Dona Trnovska Gilliland
Associate
Overview
Dona Gilliland represents technology companies, product manufacturers, and other businesses in complex disputes in state and federal courts nationwide and in arbitral proceedings. She manages matters through all stages of litigation and dispute resolution, including fact and expert discovery, depositions, significant motion practice, arbitration, trial preparation, trial, and post-trial proceedings. Dona has particular experience defending technology and app-based businesses, coordinating product liability and mass tort matters, and addressing emerging theories of liability arising from evolving technologies and business models. Her practice also includes complex commercial disputes, insurance coverage, labor and employment, and construction matters.
Dona combines careful command of the record with practical litigation judgment. She develops case strategy; directs written and third-party discovery; takes and prepares witnesses for depositions; works with expert witnesses; and briefs dispositive, jurisdictional, discovery, and other significant motions. She regularly coordinates with clients, co-counsel, and litigation teams across jurisdictions to move complex matters toward trial, arbitration, or other resolution.
Technology & Platform Litigation
Dona has substantial experience representing technology companies and digital platforms in high-stakes litigation involving novel liability theories. She has served on multiple bellwether trial teams in the Social Media Adolescent Addiction / Personal Injury Products Liability MDL and related Judicial Council Coordination Proceedings in California, where she played a central role in affirmative fact discovery and the development of case-specific defenses. Her work included preparing for and taking fact-witness and treating-physician depositions.
She also advises technology and app-based companies on issues at the intersection of established tort principles and evolving digital business models. Her experience includes matters involving platform relationships, agency and control, independent-contractor issues, emerging statutory frameworks, and protections available under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
Product Liability & Mass Tort Litigation
Dona defends businesses in product liability and mass tort litigation involving personal injury and wrongful death claims; significant damages; and complex questions of causation, control, and corporate responsibility. She develops discovery and deposition strategy; takes and prepares party and fact witnesses for depositions; coordinates expert discovery; addresses evidentiary issues; and prepares dispositive, jurisdictional, and other significant motions.
Her trial experience includes serving on a defense team during a four-week civil jury trial, where she helped manage witnesses and exhibits, addressed evidentiary issues, and assisted the team in responding to strategic developments in real time. Her practice also includes substantial post-trial motion practice and related proceedings.
Artificial Intelligence & Legal Innovation
Dona has a particular interest in the practical and responsible use of generative artificial intelligence in litigation and legal practice. She develops and shares workflows for using AI tools in legal research, factual analysis, document review, discovery, deposition preparation, and other litigation tasks, and works with colleagues to identify opportunities to use emerging technology to improve the quality and efficiency of legal work.
Within Faegre Drinker, Dona created an educational series focused on practical AI workflows for litigators. Each edition addresses a specific legal workflow and provides practical guidance that attorneys can adapt to their own matters. She is frequently consulted by colleagues seeking to evaluate potential AI use cases, troubleshoot workflows, or better understand how emerging tools can support their practices.
Prior Experience
Prior to joining the firm, Dona managed a 150-case docket as a law clerk for the Honorable J. Ronnie Greer of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. She also worked on civil and criminal matters as a clerk for New Jersey Appellate Judge Francis J. Vernoia. Her federal district and state appellate clerkships continue to inform her approach to written advocacy, case strategy, and judicial decision-making.
During law school, Dona externed for Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes of the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee and for the general counsel for the NHL team, the Nashville Predators. Before beginning her legal career, Dona taught secondary-school students as a Teach for America educator.
Personal Interests
Outside the office, Dona enjoys taking Pilates classes, antiquing, renovating her historic home, and walking her German Shepherd.
Credentials
Bar Admissions
New Jersey
New York
Tennessee
District of Columbia
Court Admissions
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Clerkships
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Hon. J. Ronnie Greer, 2018-2021
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, Hon. Francis J. Vernoia, 2017-2018
Languages
Macedonian
Education
Vanderbilt University Law School
J.D. (2017)
Johns Hopkins University
B.A. in International Studies and Art History, with honors (2012)
Insights & Events
Insights
News
Other Perspectives
- A Win for the Gig Economy: First Appellate Ruling on Florida’s Transportation Network Companies Statute Affirms Independent Contractor Protections
Republished in Benefits Law Journal, Vol. 39, No. 1, Spring 2026
Honors
- District of Columbia Courts — Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll, 2022-23
- Faegre Drinker — Pro Bono Honor Roll, 2022-23, 2025
This award is conferred by Faegre Drinker. A description of the selection methodology is available here. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
- Tennessee Courts — Attorney for Justice, 2023
No aspect of these recognitions has been approved by the highest court of any state.