June 01, 2021

Supreme Court Decides United States v. Cooley

On June 1, 2021, the Supreme Court decided United States v. Cooley, No. 19-1414, holding that Indian tribe police officers retain authority to search and temporarily detain suspected non-Indian criminals on public rights-of-way within the tribe’s reservation.

In Cooley, the Court considered the propriety of a stop of a non-Indian motorist effectuated by an Indian nation’s police officer on a public right-of-way running through the officer’s reservation. During the stop, the officer searched and detained the driver (Cooley) because he suspected that Cooley — who presented with watery, bloodshot eyes, had two semiautomatic rifles beside him on the front seat of his vehicle, and was in visible possession of a glass pipe and bag of methamphetamine — was violating state and federal law. The officer then transferred the driver to the proper non-tribal authorities.

After a federal grand jury indicted Cooley on drug and firearms charges, the district court granted his motion to suppress evidence that the tribal police officer had seized, concluding that the seizure exceeded the officer’s authority. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit affirmed and denied the Government’s motion for rehearing en banc.

The Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s decision. The Court began by repeating its longstanding rule that Indian nations’ generally lack jurisdiction over non-Indians, subject to the two “Montana exceptions” established in Montana v. United States, 450 U.S. 544, 565 (1981). Most relevant here, the Court concluded, was the tribe’s inherent power to regulate conduct of non-Indians within its reservation, where that conduct “directly threatens or has some direct effect on the political integrity, the economic security, or the health and welfare of the tribe.” The Court concluded that this exception “fits almost like a glove here.” Finding no evidence that Congress had sought to exercise its power to limit Indian nations’ sovereignty in this regard, the Court held that the tribal police officer possessed the authority to search and temporarily detain Cooley, a non-Indian using a public right-of-way in the reservation, for suspected criminal conduct.

Justice Breyer delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

Related Legal Services

Related Topics

The Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP website uses cookies to make your browsing experience as useful as possible. In order to have the full site experience, keep cookies enabled on your web browser. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP's cookies information for more details.