Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership | This website contains attorney advertising.
February 21, 2018

Supreme Court Ruling May Encourage Reporting of Suspected Violations to the SEC

On February 21, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court clarified and narrowed the definition of “whistleblowers” who, under the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, are eligible for bounties and protected from retaliation under certain circumstances. In Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, slip opinion, No. 167-1276 (Feb. 21, 2018), the Court held that Dodd-Frank’s anti-retaliation provisions extend only to individuals who report suspected violations of the securities laws to the SEC. In so doing, the Court rejected a former employee’s argument that the definition of a “whistleblower” as “any individual who provides . . . information relating to a violation of the securities laws to the Commission” applied only to the statute’s award program, and that he was eligible for anti-retaliation protection notwithstanding his failure to report to the SEC.

This ruling may tend to encourage disgruntled employees to report their suspicions to the SEC. To mitigate the risk of undisclosed reports, companies should continue to adopt best practices for whistleblower programs including effective reporting systems that encourage whistleblowers to report early and within the company, while avoiding dissuading potential whistleblowers from reporting outside the company. Employee training and education on reporting systems, subjects and procedures is also advised. Reporting systems should be secure and confidential, user-friendly, independent from regular internal business reporting channels, and monitored and audited frequently.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

The Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP website uses cookies to make your browsing experience as useful as possible. In order to have the full site experience, keep cookies enabled on your web browser. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP's cookies information for more details.