.svg?rev=a492cc1069df46bdab38f8cb66573f1c&hash=2617C9FE8A7B0BD1C43269B5D5ED9AE2)
Updates
Supreme Court opinions with 5-4 splits and Justices apparently voting contrary to type with unusual alliances are often the most interesting opinions issued. The close vote in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Company is a fine example of this type of decision. Aaron Van Oort and Eileen Hunter explain why this decision crossed ideological lines of the justices and how decisions like this reveal an interesting insight into how justices interpret law. Read more...
Originally printed in The Federalist Society's scholarly journal Engage.
The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.
