June 21, 2010

Recent Scrutiny of Advisory Arrangements

This article by Philadelphia partner Josh Deringer and associate Lisa Whittaker discusses the increasing scrutiny of investment company boards’ consideration of advisory agreements, and the fees paid to investment advisers. It examines the ways in which increased inspection has manifested: lawsuits under Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended; SEC enforcement actions; and shareholder proposals seeking to influence board decision-making. The authors conclude that “the specific effects of each of these developments remain to be seen,” however, “it is clear that shareholders, courts and the SEC are paying increased attention to the considerations of investment company boards in the context of retaining an investment adviser.”

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

Related Legal Services

The Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP website uses cookies to make your browsing experience as useful as possible. In order to have the full site experience, keep cookies enabled on your web browser. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP's cookies information for more details.