Eric M. Friedman

Associate

Overview

Eric Friedman is a scientist dressed in lawyers’ clothing. He has experience defending companies accused of a wide variety of torts, but brings special skill to the scientific and expert witness issues that present themselves during product liability litigation. As a biochemist-turned-attorney, Eric is equally comfortable reviewing medical literature and researching case law. He blends those endeavors seamlessly when defending the science behind a company’s products, whether helping to develop and present defense theories or identifying and attacking the weaknesses in an opposing expert’s opinion.

Before joining the firm, Eric worked with a well-respected defense firm in the San Francisco Bay Area. During that time, he assisted clients on hundreds of cases, navigating the ins and outs of California state courts while defending tort claims from pre-litigation through settlement/trial.

Eric serves as co-chair of the firm’s Product Liability and Mass Torts Science & Experts Team and writes frequently on developments in expert witness discovery and admissibility. When he is not defending companies from tort claims, you’ll likely find him working pro bono to help veterans obtain disability benefits, or spending time with his wife and three young children.

Related Industries

Credentials

Bar Admissions

California
Indiana

Court Admissions

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Education

University of California, Berkeley
M.A. in Molecular and Cell Biology (2007)

University of California, Hastings College of the Law
J.D. magna cum laude, Order of the Coif, Hastings Law Journal (senior articles editor) (2011)

University of Wisconsin - Madison
B.S. in Biochemistry (2003)

Insights & Events

Latest
Blog Post March 2024

Missing the Mark: Summary Judgment Granted Where Plaintiff’s Experts Opine on Defect but Fail to Support Causation

Faegre Drinker on Products blog
2 min read  
Blog Post March 2024

California Appellate Court Upholds Federal Preemption of Negligent Undertaking Claim Under the Medical Device Amendments of 1976

Faegre Drinker on Products blog
2 min read  
News March 2024

Faegre Drinker Attorneys Receive 2024 JD Supra Readers’ Choice Awards

1 min read  
Blog Post February 2024

Old Habits Die Hard: First Circuit Cites Newly Amended Language of FRE 702 But Follows Abrogated Precedent Instead

Faegre Drinker on Products blog
2 min read  
Blog Post December 2023

Amended FRE 702 Arrives in MDL Practice: S.D.N.Y. Excludes Plaintiffs’ Experts in Acetaminophen MDL

Faegre Drinker on Products Blog
1 min read  
Blog Post December 2023

Something to Celebrate: A Brief Guide to the FRE 702 Amendments

Faegre Drinker on Products Blog
1 min read  
Blog Post September 2023

Experts Who Cannot Articulate a Standard Cannot Opine that a Defendant Failed to Meet the Standard

Faegre Drinker on Products Blog
2 min read  
Blog Post August 2023

Courts Are Citing the Rule 702 Amendments – And Litigants Should, Too

Faegre Drinker on Products Blog
1 min read  
News August 2023

Faegre Drinker Attorneys Recognized in Best Lawyers in America 2024 Edition

20 min read  
Recorded Webinar March 14, 2023 CLE

Allegations of Cancer-Causing Chemicals in Personal Care and Cosmetics Products - Webinar

2 min read  
Insights
Blog Post March 2024

Missing the Mark: Summary Judgment Granted Where Plaintiff’s Experts Opine on Defect but Fail to Support Causation

Faegre Drinker on Products blog
2 min read  
Blog Post March 2024

California Appellate Court Upholds Federal Preemption of Negligent Undertaking Claim Under the Medical Device Amendments of 1976

Faegre Drinker on Products blog
2 min read  
Blog Post February 2024

Old Habits Die Hard: First Circuit Cites Newly Amended Language of FRE 702 But Follows Abrogated Precedent Instead

Faegre Drinker on Products blog
2 min read  
Blog Post December 2023

Amended FRE 702 Arrives in MDL Practice: S.D.N.Y. Excludes Plaintiffs’ Experts in Acetaminophen MDL

Faegre Drinker on Products Blog
1 min read  
Blog Post December 2023

Something to Celebrate: A Brief Guide to the FRE 702 Amendments

Faegre Drinker on Products Blog
1 min read  
Blog Post September 2023

Experts Who Cannot Articulate a Standard Cannot Opine that a Defendant Failed to Meet the Standard

Faegre Drinker on Products Blog
2 min read  
Blog Post August 2023

Courts Are Citing the Rule 702 Amendments – And Litigants Should, Too

Faegre Drinker on Products Blog
1 min read  
Blog Post August 2023

Can a Treating Physician Opine on Causation? Eleventh Circuit Says It’s About Intent, not Content

Faegre Drinker on Products Blog
1 min read  
Blog Post May 2023

Indiana Court of Appeals Holds Product Misuse Unforeseeable in Light of Product Warnings, Reverses Denial of Summary Judgment

1 min read  
Blog Post May 2023

Court Finds Ship Has Sailed for Seaman to Disclose Expert’s Opinions, Resulting in Summary Judgment

1 min read  
Other Perspectives

Firm Blog Contributions

  • Faegre Drinker on Products – a blog addressing all things product liability that covers legal issues and developments of interest to product manufacturers and their employers

Leadership & Community

Professional Associations

  • Indianapolis Bar Association
  • Defense Research Institute

Honors

  • Best Lawyers® — "Ones to Watch," Product Liability Litigation – Defendants, 2022-24
  • Faegre Drinker — Pro Bono Honor Roll, 2020-23
Awards Methodology
No aspect of these recognitions has been approved by the highest court of any state.
The Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP website uses cookies to make your browsing experience as useful as possible. In order to have the full site experience, keep cookies enabled on your web browser. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP's cookies information for more details.