.svg?rev=a492cc1069df46bdab38f8cb66573f1c&hash=2617C9FE8A7B0BD1C43269B5D5ED9AE2)
Blog Post
Brands are increasingly looking to draw sharp distinctions between their products and those of their rivals, and the pet food space is no exception. The National Advertising Division's (NAD) recent decision in Case No. 7523, The Farmer's Dog, Inc. v. Sundays for Dogs (closed April 8, 2026), offers a useful set of reminders for advertisers about the boundaries of permissible comparative, ingredient, pricing, and origin claims.
The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.
