Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership | This website contains attorney advertising.
March 03, 2009

Bill Introduced by Congressional Republicans Seeks to Counter Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA)

In an effort to counter the Employee Free Choice Act, last week Congressional Republicans introduced their own bill, the Secret Ballot Protection Act, which would secure employees' right to a secret ballot election conducted by the National Labor Relations Board (Board).  As it currently exists, the National Labor Relations Act (Act) grants exclusive representation of employees to the union "designated or selected" by the majority of employees.  However, the Act articulates no defined process for how the union is to be "designated or selected."  The Secret Ballot Protection Act would amend the Act by requiring the union to be designated or selected by a secret ballot election.

The Secret Ballot Protection Act directly opposes the Employee Free Choice Act, which would require the Board to certify a union if a majority of employees signed union authorization cards. 

Instead, the Secret Ballot Protection Act would make it an unfair labor practice for an employer to recognize or bargain with a union that has not been selected by a majority of employees in a secret ballot election conducted by the Board.  Similarly, a union would commit an unfair labor practice by causing or attempting to cause an employer to recognize or bargain with a union which has not been selected by a majority of employees in a Board conducted secret ballot election.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.