Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership | This website contains attorney advertising.
September 30, 2008

Agreement to Vary Holiday Dates Effective

In Industry & Commerce Maintenance Limited v Briffa UKEAT/0125/08, Mr Briffa was given one week's notice of termination of his employment by his employer. He was required to take 4 days' holiday in his last week to use up his outstanding holiday entitlement. The issue under consideration was whether or not this was lawful.

An Employment Tribunal held that the employer company breached Regulation 15 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (the "WTR") which provides that an employer must give notice of holiday dates that is "double the amount of time to be taken." As Mr Briffa was not given 8 days' notice of his holiday, he could not legally be required to take it. Accordingly, Mr Briffa was awarded 4 days' pay in lieu of his holiday entitlement.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that Regulation 15 of the WTR had been effectively varied by "relevant agreement". In the present case, there was a contractual term which covered the position and was legally enforceable between the parties. As such, the EAT allowed the appeal and Mr Briffa's award was set aside.
The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.