No Judge Shopping Allowed: Illinois Supreme Court Speaks on Standards of For-Cause Petitions for Substitutions of a Judge in Illinois
By Carrie E. DeLange
Chicago associate Carrie DeLange authored “No Judge Shopping Allowed: Illinois Supreme Court Speaks on Standards of For-Cause Petitions for Substitutions of a Judge in Illinois” for the Lake County Bar Association’s The Docket.
The article discusses a divorce case where the Illinois Supreme Court had the opportunity to decide the standard on for-cause petitions for substitutions of a judge. The case, In Re Marriage O’Brien, involved a husband, John O’Brien, who believed that the judge presiding over his divorce proceeding was biased in a number of ways, including due to the fact that the judge went to the same health club as his then-wife.
The Supreme Court ultimately rejected Mr. O’Brien’s arguments concerning the standard for substitution of judge. It held that the appropriate standard to adopt in determining whether a litigant has shown the court “cause” in a for-cause substitution petition, is to inquire whether the litigant has shown actual prejudice or personal judicial bias, and not merely to inquire whether the opinions formed by a judge suggest prejudice or inquire whether judicial remarks that occurred during the course of trial indicate prejudice.
The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.
Meet the Authors
