Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership | This website contains attorney advertising.
August 31, 2010

Equal Pay Claims: Guidance on How to Compare Employees

In Brownbill and others v St Helens and Knowsley Hospital NHS Trust, the Employment Appeal Tribunal confirmed that the correct approach in equal pay claims is to compare each individual term of the contract separately.  It is not sufficient to compare overall remuneration packages.

A number of female NHS workers claimed that their employment contracts contained unsocial hours payments which were less favourable than those in male workers' contracts.  Although this was true, the female employees in fact received a higher rate of pay overall than male employees (after taking into account their basic pay and other terms relating to remuneration). 

The EAT held that it was necessary to consider each term of the contract separately.  In practice, this means that both sexes can benefit i.e. both men and women could end up having their terms enhanced, depending on which terms are less favourable.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.