Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership | This website contains attorney advertising.
February 01, 2010

Direct Purchasers' Standing to Sue for Walker Process Fraud

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently held that direct purchasers have standing to assert claims of Walker Process fraud, at least when a patent has already been found to be unenforceable due to inequitable conduct.

Apparently wary of expanding the universe of potential patent challengers, the court was careful to limit its holding to the factual scenario before it—one where the plaintiffs challenged an "already tarnished patent." Because the decision is narrowly crafted, it seems unlikely to cause an explosion in Walker Process challenges by purchasers, absent further expansions by other courts in standing to bring Walker Process claims.

Licensees, however, have one more reason to be proactive when potential issues arise regarding the validity of a patent that they have licensed. Read more…

AIPLA Antitrust News, newsletter of the AIPLA Antitrust Committee (January 2010)

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

Related Legal Services