Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership | This website contains attorney advertising.
March 04, 2009

Value of Combined Heat And Power (CHP) Systems

Combined heat and power ("CHP") systems tick many boxes. They offer both heat and power economically and efficiently. They range from small, local systems using, for example, wood chip burning boilers to wide-ranging partnerships between landowners and utilities. Naturally, they are attractive, both to occupiers and planning authorities.

However, a recent European decision shows that CHP systems can cause competition issues. The case concerned a CHP system installed and managed by the owner of Leipzig Airport, with a view to supplying all its occupiers with heat and power. One occupier, though, preferred not to use the owner's CHP system. It sited an EU Directive governing the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity that outlaws arrangements which are anti-competitive. There are some exceptions, but the European Court ruled that these did not apply to the Airport owner. The Court ruled that the occupier's chosen supplier could provide power using the owner's CHP system.

Nevertheless, both CHP systems themselves and legal solutions for their implementation are evolving. Such solutions include the retention of appropriate rights for both owners and occupiers. Faegre & Benson LLP are well-placed to assist developers in the successful implementation of CHP systems throughout Europe; Faegre & Benson are also well-placed to assist many owners and occupiers identify legal issues relating to existing CHP systems.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.