Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership | This website contains attorney advertising.
December 23, 2008

TUPE—Employer's Duty to Inform and Consult

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held in Royal Mail Group Ltd v Communication Workers Union UKEAT/0338/08/DA that where an employer genuinely believes that TUPE does not apply, it will not automatically be in breach of its information and consultation obligations by failing to inform employees of the correct legal position.

Post Office Limited operated a network of post offices and was a wholly owned subsidiary of Royal Mail Group Limited (Royal Mail). Due to losses, Royal Mail transferred some post offices to franchisees. The affected employees were told that they would not transfer to the franchisees but would either become voluntarily redundant or be redeployed within Post Office Limited. No direct consultation with the recognised union, Communication Workers Union (the Union), took place.

None of the affected employees brought claims post transfer. However, the Union successfully brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal on the grounds that there had not been proper information or consultation, as required by TUPE. The EAT overturned the Tribunal's decision and held that while there is an obligation for employers to provide their view of the legal implications of the transfer, they are not automatically in breach of their information and consultation obligations under TUPE if that view is incorrect.
The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.