January 28, 2018

Materiality and Implied False Certification: Split Circuit Decisions and the Impact of Escobar on Pending and Future False Claims Cases

Overview

Washington, D.C., partner Jesse Witten spoke on a panel at the American Conference Institute’s Advanced Forum on False Claims Act and Qui Tam Enforcement, on January 29, 2018, in New York. Appearing on the panel with Jesse were an attorney who represents relators and an Assistant Attorney General from the Office of the Attorney General for New York.

The panel, titled “Materiality and Implied False Certification: Split Circuit Decisions and the Impact of Escobar on Pending and Future False Claims Cases” examined and debated the meaning and impact of the Supreme Court’s important decision in United States ex rel. Escobar v. Universal Health Services. Jesse discussed how the lower courts have applied the Escobar holding that False Claims Act liability requires that the falsity in a false claim be material to the government’s payment decision, as well as how lower courts have interpreted the implied certification theory of liability that the Supreme Court adopted in Escobar.

Learn more about the Advanced Forum on False Claims Act and Qui Tam Enforcement.

The Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP website uses cookies to make your browsing experience as useful as possible. In order to have the full site experience, keep cookies enabled on your web browser. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP's cookies information for more details.