2008

Client Challenges Constitutionality of Mandatory Minimum Sentences

North America - United States

Our firm represented a client who challenged the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences dictated by factual findings made by a mere preponderance of the evidence, rather than beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Clark, 538 F.3d 803 (7th Cir. 2008).

The Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP website uses cookies to make your browsing experience as useful as possible. In order to have the full site experience, keep cookies enabled on your web browser. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP's cookies information for more details.