February 11, 2016

Proposed $13 Million Settlement in LinkedIn Privacy Case Awaits Court Approval

Lawyers in a privacy class action against LinkedIn have urged the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California to give final approval to a $13 million settlement that was made public last year. The deadline for filing claims has now passed, with 550,000 LinkedIn users filing claims. Under the terms of the settlement, each user would receive approximately $16, with class counsel receiving more than $3 million in attorneys’ fees. The monetary conditions of the proposed settlement differ from other recent privacy settlements in which Internet-based companies funded nonprofits rather than compensating affected individuals directly.

Other terms of the proposed settlement require LinkedIn to expressly inform users that the “Add Connections” mechanism imports their personal address book and to allow “Add Connections” users to decide which contacts receive automated invitations to join their particular network as well as any follow-up emails.

The underlying lawsuit was filed in September 2013 by a group of LinkedIn users who claimed that the company violated federal wiretapping laws by intentionally “hacking” into their accounts and “misappropriated” their names and identities by sending unauthorized email invitations to the users’ “friends.” Ultimately, the court dismissed the hacking claim, but allowed the remaining claims to proceed.

Access information relating to the class action and settlement.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

The Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP website uses cookies to make your browsing experience as useful as possible. In order to have the full site experience, keep cookies enabled on your web browser. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP's cookies information for more details.