January 01, 1994

The Misapplication of Qualified Immunity: Unfair Procedural Burdens for Constitutional Damage Claims Requiring Proof of the Defendant's Intent

Commercial Litigation Partner Clay Pierce's law review note argues that courts should not raise procedural burdens for plaintiffs bringing constitutional damages claims based on the defendant's unlawful intent.

The cite is as follows: The Misapplication of Qualified Immunity: Unfair Burdens for Constitutional Damages Claims Requiring Proof of the Defendant's Intent, 62 Fordham L. Rev. 1769 (1994)

The Faegre Baker Daniels website uses cookies to make your browsing experience as useful as possible. In order to have the full site experience, keep cookies enabled on your web browser. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review Faegre Baker Daniels' cookies information for more details.