Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership | This website contains attorney advertising.
July 23, 2018

More Bites at the Apple?

Bob Stoll, partner and chair of the Intellectual Property Group in Washington, D.C., penned the IPWatchdog article “More Bites at the Apple?” The article discusses why weak estoppels after a final decision at the Patent Trial and Appeals Board are becoming a problem within the patent-holder community.

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has been saying that the percentage of subsequent filings of IPRs is relatively low, since follow-on petitions in IPRs are only permitted by the same petitioner when there was no written decision in a previous case. The USPTO claims that “gang tackling” of patents is not occurring at the rates patent owners argue that it is happening. However, Bob used the example of TCL Communications’ case to showcase how companies are finding ways to file subsequent IPRs.

Read “More Bites at the Apple?

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

Related Legal Services

The Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP website uses cookies to make your browsing experience as useful as possible. In order to have the full site experience, keep cookies enabled on your web browser. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP's cookies information for more details.