September 8, 2016

New Legislation is Not Needed to Fix Post Grant Procedures at the PTO

Washington, D.C. partner and co-chair of the IP Group, Bob Stoll recently published an article for IP Watchdog titled, “New Legislation is Not Needed to Fix Post Grant Procedures at the PTO.” In the article, Bob discusses the America Invents Act (AIA) and problems surrounding post grant review procedures: Post Grant Review; Inter Partes Review and the Transitional Covered Business Method procedure (CBM).

As Bob explains, these tools are used as an adjunct strategy to patent litigation, not as an alternative as was intended. Damage issues, venue, pleading requirements and discovery scope have all been carved out of legislation when courts acted in a manner to address the issues. And, the enumerated problems with the post grant procedures could be bettered by iterative improvements both at the courts and the USPTO rather than time consuming and uncertain legislation.

Read: “New Legislation is Not Needed to Fix Post Grant Procedures at the PTO”

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

Related Legal Services

The Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP website uses cookies to make your browsing experience as useful as possible. In order to have the full site experience, keep cookies enabled on your web browser. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP's cookies information for more details.