June 29, 2015

One Year After Alice: Was It the Right Medicine?

One year ago, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Alice v. CLS Bank, and immediately, many in the patent community feared that the ambiguous language in the case would lead to unpredictable applications of 35 U.S.C. §101 and the loss of patent protection for many valuable inventions.

To better determine whether these concerns were coming to fruition and to study how Alice was being interpreted by courts and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the American Bar Association’s Section of Intellectual Property Law formed the “Post-Alice Task Force,” consisting of over 60 attorneys with a wide variety of viewpoints and experiences.

Faegre Baker Daniels intellectual property partner Scott Alter and associate Richard Marsh authored an article for Law360 discussing the findings of the task force.

Full Article

Services and Industries

The Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP website uses cookies to make your browsing experience as useful as possible. In order to have the full site experience, keep cookies enabled on your web browser. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP's cookies information for more details.